Fri., Apr. 10, 2015
Fri., Apr. 10, 2015
Mon., Apr. 6, 2015
Fri., Apr. 3, 2015
Fri., Apr. 3, 2015
Wed., Apr. 1, 2015
Mon., Mar. 30, 2015
Indiana freshman forwards Peter Jurkin and Hanner Mosquera-Perea will be required to sit out nine games by the NCAA and required to pay back benefits to charity. The reason for the suspension were the benefits both received from Mark Adams, the founder of the A-HOPE organization. The NCAA had originally considered the benefits legal, but learned that Adams had donated $185 to Indiana’s Varsity Club from 1986-92 and is therefore forever considered a booster of Indiana.
Indiana’s letter on the issue follows.
NCAA Enforcement Accepts Secondary Violations; NCAA Reinstatement Determines Peter Jurkin and Hanner Mosquera-
Perea Must Donate to Charity and Sit Nine Games; University to Appeal Number of Games
BLOOMINGTON, Ind. – Calling Indiana University’s corrective actions “substantial and meaningful,” the NCAA on October 31, 2012, accepted
as secondary a case IU filed with it on June 22, 2012. In short, that case involves the provision of what would generally have
been permissible expenses but for the provider’s donation of $185 to the IU Varsity Club between 1986 and 1992, rendering him forever a
“booster” under NCAA rules, notwithstanding that the donations were minimal in nature and occurred over 20 years ago.
Because the NCAA permits prospective student-athletes to receive normal and reasonable living expenses from an individual with whom
the student-athlete has an established relationship (such as a non-scholastic athletics team coach like in this case), most of the expenses
in this matter would have been generally permissible had not the benefactor been deemed a “booster” based upon those dated, nominal
Varsity Club donations. Since his last donation in 1992, twenty years ago, and more than 15 years before he first provided the expenses,
the benefactor has made no additional financial contributions in support of Indiana University. The benefactor, Mark Adams, fully disclosed
both his Varsity Club contributions and former student-athlete expenses at the time of the first eligibility determination in 2008 for Tijan
Jobe, and he has completely cooperated with this review.
As detailed in the NCAA’s October 31, 2012 decision letter:
The institution was aware that Mr. Adams and his nonprofit organization had provided support to Mr. Perea and Mr. Jurkin, but
believed such support was generally permissible pursuant to an NCAA June 6, 2000, interpretation, given Mr. Adams’ status as
their nonscholastic coach and Mr. Perea’s apparent legal guardian. At the time, the institution did not believe Mr. Adams to be
a representative of their athletics interests. From the summer of 2010 through April 2011, during the course of planning the
recruitment of Mr. Perea and Mr. Jurkin, the institution’s compliance staff worked closely with the conference office, the NCAA
AMA staff and NCAA enforcement basketball focusgroup staff regarding the relationship between Mr. Adams and the institu
tion’s men’s basketball program and how to ensure the permissible recruitment of prospective student-athletes with ties to Mr.
Adams’ nonscholastic team.
It was not until April 2011 that the then assistant athletics director for compliance revealed for the first time that he had knowl
edge that Mr. Adams previously had made donations to the institution’s booster club. After completing his degree in 1980,
Mr. Adams donated nominal amounts to the institution’s booster club. In total, Mr. Adams donated $185 between 1986 and
1992. He has made no other additional financial contributions in support of the institution’s athletics program.
Despite the minimal nature of Mr. Adams’ donations, and the fact that the last donation he made was more than 15 years before
he provided expenses to a prospective student-athlete who enrolled at the institution, Mr. Adams must be considered a represen
tative of the institution’s athletics interests
The NCAA Basketball Focus Group worked with Indiana University staff to review the interaction between the men’s basketball program and
Adams, A-HOPE, and Indiana Elite and have found no impermissible access or additional basis to further establish Adams as a representative
of Indiana University’s athletics interests.
INDIANA ATHLETICS UPDATE ON PETER JURKIN/HANNER PEREA • 2
“This matter was discovered internally and promptly reported to the NCAA,” said Fred Glass, Indiana University Vice President and Director
of Intercollegiate Athletics. “At the NCAA’s direction, we conducted an extensive and thorough review in cooperation and consultation
with the NCAA Basketball Focus Group. While I am very disappointed with these circumstances, I am very pleased with the way we have
responded and appreciative of the NCAA’s professional guidance and assistance. I would also like to thank Mark Adams for his forthright
candor and cooperation in this matter.”
After the completion of the internal review in consultation with the NCAA Basketball Focus Group, Indiana University self-imposed the
following penalties and corrective actions as part of its June 22, 2012, self-report: a $5,000 fine (based upon the NCAA’s established
formula for a failure to properly certify a student-athlete); a one-year suspension of the benefactor’s communication with the men’s
basketball coaching staff; and completion of the NCAA Student-Athlete Reinstatement process for the two incoming student-athletes,
Hanner Perea and Peter Jurkin. Again, the NCAA later characterized these actions as “substantial and meaningful.”
On July 27, 2012 Indiana University filed with the NCAA requests for reinstatement of student-athlete eligibility for Peter Jurkin and
Hanner Perea. Indiana University proposed that, based on the totality of these rather unusual circumstances, each student-athlete should
be immediately reinstated (that is, without being withheld from any games) and that Jurkin should repay $250 of his reportedly $6,000
in impermissible expenses and Perea $1,238.69 of his approximately $8,000 in impermissible expenses. These expenses included food,
clothing, housing, travel, toiletries, a cell phone, a laptop, and other miscellaneous items. On October 29, 2012, after receiving the final
set of requested facts from the university the previous week, the NCAA reinstatement staff issued its initial decision that it was requiring
Jurkin to repay $250 and Perea to repay $1,588.69 and that they each be withheld from the first nine games of this basketball season.
The university then submitted additional information for consideration on the evening of November 1, 2012. After thoroughly reviewing
the new information, the NCAA reinstatement staff issued its reconsideration decision the next day confirming its initial decision. Their
written decision was received by Indiana University on November 6, 2012. This week Indiana University will file with the Student Athlete
Reinstatement Committee its appeal of the staff’s action as to the number of games from which the student-athletes are to be withheld.
IU’s June 22, 2012 Self-Report for Secondary Violations and the NCAA’s October 31, 2012 acceptance letter thereof are attached to this
Read more in Men's Basketball
Pfunk, Fabulous for your Son and I mean it from the bottom of my hea [...]
Po, I U South, At the time, I looked up the rosters and listed the [...]
beat Purdue, are you kidding? Chemistry is not important on a womens t [...]
Seems as if Thon Maker has it down to Indiana and UK. Can you fill us [...]
Seems there was a whole lot more going on on the inside besides change [...]
beat purdue, , while I agree if we can recruit two studs things will b [...]
IU79...I would like to think we can win 6-7 games but as enthusiastic [...]