Mosquera-Perea and Jurkin forced to sit out nine games by NCAA

Indiana freshman forwards Peter Jurkin and Hanner Mosquera-Perea will be required to sit out nine games by the NCAA and required to pay back benefits to charity. The reason for the suspension were the benefits both received from Mark Adams, the founder of the A-HOPE organization. The NCAA had originally considered the benefits legal, but learned that Adams had donated $185 to Indiana’s Varsity Club from 1986-92 and is therefore forever considered a booster of Indiana.

Indiana’s letter on the issue follows.

NCAA Enforcement Accepts Secondary Violations; NCAA Reinstatement Determines Peter Jurkin and Hanner Mosquera-
Perea Must Donate to Charity and Sit Nine Games; University to Appeal Number of Games
BLOOMINGTON, Ind. – Calling Indiana University’s corrective actions “substantial and meaningful,” the NCAA on October 31, 2012, accepted
as secondary a case IU filed with it on June 22, 2012. In short, that case involves the provision of what would generally have
been permissible expenses but for the provider’s donation of $185 to the IU Varsity Club between 1986 and 1992, rendering him forever a
“booster” under NCAA rules, notwithstanding that the donations were minimal in nature and occurred over 20 years ago.
Because the NCAA permits prospective student-athletes to receive normal and reasonable living expenses from an individual with whom
the student-athlete has an established relationship (such as a non-scholastic athletics team coach like in this case), most of the expenses
in this matter would have been generally permissible had not the benefactor been deemed a “booster” based upon those dated, nominal
Varsity Club donations. Since his last donation in 1992, twenty years ago, and more than 15 years before he first provided the expenses,
the benefactor has made no additional financial contributions in support of Indiana University. The benefactor, Mark Adams, fully disclosed
both his Varsity Club contributions and former student-athlete expenses at the time of the first eligibility determination in 2008 for Tijan
Jobe, and he has completely cooperated with this review.
As detailed in the NCAA’s October 31, 2012 decision letter:
The institution was aware that Mr. Adams and his nonprofit organization had provided support to Mr. Perea and Mr. Jurkin, but
believed such support was generally permissible pursuant to an NCAA June 6, 2000, interpretation, given Mr. Adams’ status as
their nonscholastic coach and Mr. Perea’s apparent legal guardian. At the time, the institution did not believe Mr. Adams to be
a representative of their athletics interests. From the summer of 2010 through April 2011, during the course of planning the
recruitment of Mr. Perea and Mr. Jurkin, the institution’s compliance staff worked closely with the conference office, the NCAA
AMA staff and NCAA enforcement basketball focusgroup staff regarding the relationship between Mr. Adams and the institu
tion’s men’s basketball program and how to ensure the permissible recruitment of prospective student-athletes with ties to Mr.
Adams’ nonscholastic team.
It was not until April 2011 that the then assistant athletics director for compliance revealed for the first time that he had knowl
edge that Mr. Adams previously had made donations to the institution’s booster club. After completing his degree in 1980,
Mr. Adams donated nominal amounts to the institution’s booster club. In total, Mr. Adams donated $185 between 1986 and
1992. He has made no other additional financial contributions in support of the institution’s athletics program.
Despite the minimal nature of Mr. Adams’ donations, and the fact that the last donation he made was more than 15 years before
he provided expenses to a prospective student-athlete who enrolled at the institution, Mr. Adams must be considered a represen
tative of the institution’s athletics interests
The NCAA Basketball Focus Group worked with Indiana University staff to review the interaction between the men’s basketball program and
Adams, A-HOPE, and Indiana Elite and have found no impermissible access or additional basis to further establish Adams as a representative
of Indiana University’s athletics interests.
“This matter was discovered internally and promptly reported to the NCAA,” said Fred Glass, Indiana University Vice President and Director
of Intercollegiate Athletics. “At the NCAA’s direction, we conducted an extensive and thorough review in cooperation and consultation
with the NCAA Basketball Focus Group. While I am very disappointed with these circumstances, I am very pleased with the way we have
responded and appreciative of the NCAA’s professional guidance and assistance. I would also like to thank Mark Adams for his forthright
candor and cooperation in this matter.”
After the completion of the internal review in consultation with the NCAA Basketball Focus Group, Indiana University self-imposed the
following penalties and corrective actions as part of its June 22, 2012, self-report: a $5,000 fine (based upon the NCAA’s established
formula for a failure to properly certify a student-athlete); a one-year suspension of the benefactor’s communication with the men’s
basketball coaching staff; and completion of the NCAA Student-Athlete Reinstatement process for the two incoming student-athletes,
Hanner Perea and Peter Jurkin. Again, the NCAA later characterized these actions as “substantial and meaningful.”
On July 27, 2012 Indiana University filed with the NCAA requests for reinstatement of student-athlete eligibility for Peter Jurkin and
Hanner Perea. Indiana University proposed that, based on the totality of these rather unusual circumstances, each student-athlete should
be immediately reinstated (that is, without being withheld from any games) and that Jurkin should repay $250 of his reportedly $6,000
in impermissible expenses and Perea $1,238.69 of his approximately $8,000 in impermissible expenses. These expenses included food,
clothing, housing, travel, toiletries, a cell phone, a laptop, and other miscellaneous items. On October 29, 2012, after receiving the final
set of requested facts from the university the previous week, the NCAA reinstatement staff issued its initial decision that it was requiring
Jurkin to repay $250 and Perea to repay $1,588.69 and that they each be withheld from the first nine games of this basketball season.
The university then submitted additional information for consideration on the evening of November 1, 2012. After thoroughly reviewing
the new information, the NCAA reinstatement staff issued its reconsideration decision the next day confirming its initial decision. Their
written decision was received by Indiana University on November 6, 2012. This week Indiana University will file with the Student Athlete
Reinstatement Committee its appeal of the staff’s action as to the number of games from which the student-athletes are to be withheld.
IU’s June 22, 2012 Self-Report for Secondary Violations and the NCAA’s October 31, 2012 acceptance letter thereof are attached to this

Share the Scoop!


  • chris K. says:

    All I want to know is, will they be eligible to play game 10 this season?

  • Spe says:

    Really? Mixed feelings about this one but frankly this is a bit of a stretch.

  • chris K. says:

    Well, we all know th NCAA’s rues & rulings don’t have to make sense, you just have to survive them.

  • Bft says:

    The first nine games are vs nobody’s anyways

  • Harvard for Hillbillies says:

    Nine games…? Nothing but a slap on the wrist. Told ya they would be just fine. We’ll have them for the big 10 season and the stretch.

    Hell, Remy hardly saw any PT until we were that deep into the season last year.

  • hiensohn says:

    why self report when UK pays,cheats ,etc.Close the doors,give them nothing.Fight the NCAA all the way.They make me sick.

  • chris K. says:

    Because if the NCAA were to find this out on their own, & knew that IU knew about it didn’t report it, this is a much bigger problem. The real question, as always w/ the NCAA is, REALLY???

  • Laffy says:

    NCAA is a joke. That one player’s dad was actually asking for hundreds of thousands of dollars and they did NOTHING because they said, “Well, the dad did it instead of the kid.”

    The games may be against “nobodies” but they need the playing time/experience……especially with Elston hurt.

    I guess it could have been worse…….

  • Chet says:

    Missed it by about 40 hours, dangit. But a a miss is still a miss.

  • nick says:

    BFT – the first 9 games include Georgia, UCLA/Georgetown and UNC — not exactly nobodies. That being said, it’s not the end of the world. I do believe that this is excessive given the minimal amount of money donated and the time since last donation. Does the “Booster for Life” status really make sense when someone has donated so little?

  • Harvard for Hillbillies says:

    Mike Fish caught a sickly bluegill. What a feast for the Establishment.

    Meanwhile, a Duke player buys $100,000 in diamond jewelry on road trips to NYC. But why on earth would the NCAA want to spend one dime of their efforts hunting down true corruption in college atheistic?

    We are so corrupt here in the corn belt. The NCAA let us slide on one major violation: It was discovered that Hanner was actually wiping his butt with toilet paper purchased by Adams. It’s simply criminal

  • Podunker says:

    The NCAA is a corrupt organization and they have made “majoring in minors” an art form. What a joke! Because some guy donated $185 to IU over 20 years ago, before these players were even born, he’s considered a “booster.” For goodness sake, the statute of limitations is less than 20 years for many serious crimes!

    This penalty is no big deal, but it is just a reminder that the NCAA is a feckless organization that feeds off of collegiate athletes and feels compelled to penalize innocent young people because the organization is too impotent to find and punish the serious rule-breakers. The NCAA should either be empowered by the US Congress or it should be replaced with an organization that is accountable to the public.

  • Harvard for Hillbillies says:

    oops. college athletics.

  • Geoff says:

    Another reason to despise the corrupt, retarded (sorry, but it fits), and über-hypocritical Establishment that is the NCAA. There is very little they ever do that I agree with, but this surpasses the ridiculous.

    I will run back and change my vote if the other candidate says their first action will be to disintegrate the NCAA.

    Just for Harvard, I’ll make a preditction(!) – in 2 years, after the damage (albeit minimal) to IU has been done, the NCAA will put a monetary floor and statue of limitations on amounts donated by “boosters”.

    Of course it’s the right thing thing to do… Just like rolling back the ridiculous rules on recruit contact that brought Sampson down was. But it always takes an IU investigation and sanctions to shed a light on another stupid f*kcing NCAA rule.

  • Ron says:

    So how is Perea to come up with $1200.00? Full time classes and basketball. Get a part time job? Can Mark Adams as his legal guardian pay it? Put a jar for donations at the ticket window? He was provided the $ for phone and laptop meaning he had little to no money.

    The 9 games is do-able but the repayment thing stinks. Guess we are lucky the NCAA does not over see the tax codes.

    Kinda like the oil industry. Need more money, make up reasons to increase the price. NCAA can just make up rules and have the fines paid.

  • Baguaphil says:

    Typical reaction from NCAA, making mountains out of molehills, what a bunch of crap. They allow the real crooks to keep cheating but put penalties on minor infractions. There isn!t a brain in that entire organization.

  • Harvard for Hillbillies says:

    Pretty much agree, Geoff. Then again, even if Sampson’s players were choir boys sweeter than all the future adopted children of a gay marriage between Jordy Hulls and Jonny Marlin, Hoosier fans would have ran Kelvin out of town over the 3-way/contact violation.

  • B-town88 says:

    OK, $185 20 years ago. Does that even average out to 2 cups of Starbucks a year. Really?

  • Chet says:

    He gave $185 between 1986 and 1992. That’s not even the per diem for tattoos at Kaintuck.

  • hoosierjc says:

    The NCAA proves again that it is better to lie than tell the truth. What a sad organization.

  • Harvard for Hillbillies says:

    $185..? That’s less than the two Italian dinners Patino had to pay for before he introduced his equipment manager’s wife to Cardinal Manicotti in the back restroom of Porcini’s.

  • IUSIG says:

    Why do you guys say “oh well, it’s just 9 games”? This is about the NCAA being a dictatorship that rewards crooked fact-hiding institutions but doles out unreasonable punishments to honest ones! This is not an IU problem.

  • Harvard for Hillbillies says:

    The main question: Can we get over the sense of shame? Will we be able to stomach the Seth Davis and Thad Matta smirks aimed directly into our cheating, corrupt souls? ]

    Why don’t they ever find violations at Purdue?

  • Chet says:

    Purdue is never a threat to win anything.

  • Harvard for Hillbillies says:

    …unless they’re playing the Washington Huskies.

Comments are closed.


Hoosier Sports Report is live!

Scoop Poll:

How many games will IU football win in 2016?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Podunker:

    Once again, I'm confused by Wilson's comments about his QBs. Is he pl [...]

  • Hoosier Clarion:

    v I'm with your thinking about this year and for the very reasons Po l [...]

  • Podunker:

    Wilson is doing what he's supposed to be doing, selling IU Football to [...]

  • vesuvius13:

    Listening to coach Wilson on BTN and reading this article Coach seems [...]

  • Harvard for Hillbillies:

    Not only does she "dope," she's extremely [...]

  • Harvard for Hillbillies:

    ...and protests of anything are mere shotgun approaches and 30-minut [...]

  • vesuvius13:

    H4H, the characters have been pushed out of sports over the years as [...]

Find Notre Dame football coverage on © Hoosier Times Inc., all rights reserved.