My 2 cents on the Watford thing… Crean said he “wanted an energy change” which I take to mean 2 things:
1¢) and most importantly, I believe Crean wanted to set an early tone of clearly defined intensity and havoc – both offensively and defensively. I will not outright accuse Watford of being lazy, inconsistent with effort, or un-intense… But I will say that his intensity doesn’t show… It isn’t clearly defined to the fans in Assembly Hall. Watford’s face doesn’t change expression much, he does everything at about the same smooth speed, he doesn’t really make highlight-reel plays, and he never (unless he is beating UK with a buzzer-beater) does any theatrics to pump up the crowd – its just not Wat’s demeanor. I also wonder how much Cody’s sickness played into it… Crean may very well have been concerned about the energy level and effectiveness of Cody to start the game. I’m guessing that Crean wanted to make a point FROM THE TIP-OFF that IU is here to get in your face and kick your ass… And I think he thought starting Sheehey gave them the best opportunity to set that mood in the building.
2¢) there was probably a bit of a message to Wat. Independent of this decision, and before this game, one of the things that I had noticed from the first 2 games is that Watford was the only one on the team FORCING shots. Everyone else seemed to be getting theirs in transition or the flow of the offense. I thought it was most noticeable in the first couple minutes of those 2 games as well… Before IU had gotten in to a flow. Part of that was on Crean, because he was obviously calling plays to start each game that featured Watford in the post, but most of it was on Wat for making poor decisions when he received the ball down there or in other spots. Heading into the SHST game Watford was shooting only 33% FG and was 1-6 on 3′s, and it was because very few of them were rhythm shots. Meanwhile the rest of the team was shooting 55% from the floor (53-97 FG).
So my guess is that Crean wasn’t concerned so much about Watford’s effort and wanting to make a point… I think he wanted to FEATURE Sheehey’s antics knowing the energy it would create with the crowd from word GO, and knowing that if Watford came in with the team already in an offensive flow that he would get shots in rhythm instead of forcing them.
#2
Laffy
Friday, November 16, 2012 - 10:32 AM UTC
Posts like this is why Hillbilly is jealous and posts all his crap to get attention.
Geoff knows his basketball and Harvard can’t stand it.
Great job.
#3
Chet
Friday, November 16, 2012 - 10:36 AM UTC
Good analysis, Geoff.
#4
who?
Friday, November 16, 2012 - 2:18 PM UTC
Geoff, I agree with Chet and Laffy on your analysis except for one point. You should have stated: “My 3 cents”. 1¢ + 2¢ = 3¢.
#5
Harvard for Hillbillies
Friday, November 16, 2012 - 4:57 PM UTC
Geoff’s post was extremely insightful.
Jealous? Are you kidding me? I’m really not in that league. Won’t ever pretend, nor desire, to give you the type of detailed and in-depth look to the core that Geoff can provide.
I sorta cheat when I watch hoops. When I first saw Remy play, my analysis went something like this.
#6
Harvard for Hillbillies
Friday, November 16, 2012 - 5:34 PM UTC
To Chet’s delight, a closer analysis of my predictions from last season serves as a long-awaited alternative to the repeated, ‘in your face,’ cut-and-paste.
#7
Harvard for Hillbillies
Friday, November 16, 2012 - 6:01 PM UTC
Don’t get me wrong, I respectfully stop to take full notice when Geoff becomes territorial and takes us down the road his deep insights. I totally appreciate the enormity when he opens up on here and really lets it flow. I love it when he breaks it all into segments.
#8
Yale for city slickers
Friday, November 16, 2012 - 6:50 PM UTC
How long ago did you get banned from insidethehall Harvard?
#9
Harvard for Hillbillies
Friday, November 16, 2012 - 7:11 PM UTC
My bad…It’s Friday.
It was a very good post, Geoff. I think there’s always a bit of preaching to the choir in these “messages.” And far wiser to set an example, be the stern Generalesque teacher sending the loafer to the corner of the classroom, against a Sam Houston State than a Kentucky team/game your season may hinge upon.
I thought Watford handled it all like the champion I’ve always believed him to be. Sheehey stepped up nicely..But, again, it was Sam Houston State.
Heard a song last night that I haven’t heard played on the radio for years…It was being played on n a very small market station…a real ’70s gem and an oldie that I had completely forgotten. It’s like discovering a dusty old heartwarming photo in the deep reserves the mind’s filing cabinet. Such a mystery is the brain.
Late nights could pay off soon for OladipoCHICAGO - Victor Oladipo mentions the late nights at the gym, the wear and tear on his key card, and he's quick to point out he's just a tad unusual, too.
Hoosiers move up to 10th at golf regionalFAYETTEVILLE, Ark. - Indiana shot a second-round 306 to move into a tie for 10th at the NCAA Fayetteville Men's Golf Regional.
Weatherman on "Evan Gordon commits to Indiana"NoMendacity, Chet, and others:
"Rights" have nothing to do with how Dustin moderates this blog. If the government was trying to limit your speech, invoking your rights would be appropriate. But this is a private forum maintained for the benefit of its owners. They are free to set terms of usage
Harvard for Hillbillies on "Evan Gordon commits to Indiana"Personally, I don't think it's Dustin..
If it were not for Dustin, this place would be another ITH governed/moderated by all the freedoms of a "thought police."
I actually love it when the "trolls" come on here. It's a delight to watch them get ripped to shreds by the likes of
Punjab on "Evan Gordon commits to Indiana"Sorry, Po. Just now getting back to your #79. Great points. But sometimes, facts just take the fun out of debate. Point-counterpoint can get old. Point-counterdelusionalinterperetationofhappenstance is so much more riveting.
Punjab on "Evan Gordon commits to Indiana"Kudos to everyone for keeping this discussion going in a civil manner. And a special shout out to NoMendacity for emerging as another voice of reason on here. I tire of the constant calls for censorship and banishment long before I tire of Harv's often beating of the dead horses.
Big E on "IU baseball clinches share of Big Ten title"Congrats Hoosier baseball! For a few yrs IU was clearly the worst athletic program in the B1G. With an improved football team, outright champion Basketball team and now at least a share of baseball it's safe to say IU is out of the cellar.
I don't expect IU to be
2016 big man Barret Benson no longer under the radar - Barret Benson flew under the radar during his freshman season. His Hinsdale South (Ill.) High School team won only seven games and a coaching change was made. Not many scouts were ...»
HD Video: Victor Oladipo at the NBA Draft Combine - CHICAGO — Like former teammate Cody Zeller, Victor Oladipo also skipped the drills at day one of the NBA Draft combine at the Harrison Street Athletics Facility. Inside the ...»
Seventy-Seven Players Apply For NBA Draft - The NBA announced that 77 players, including 46 players from U.S. colleges and 31 international players, have filed as early entry candidates for the 2013 NBA Draft. Players ...»
Gordon no stranger to expectations - Eron Gordon has a high ceiling for his basketball future, but the pressure is even higher. The high school freshman comes from a family of basketball success. The youngest Gordon ...»
My 2 cents on the Watford thing… Crean said he “wanted an energy change” which I take to mean 2 things:
1¢) and most importantly, I believe Crean wanted to set an early tone of clearly defined intensity and havoc – both offensively and defensively. I will not outright accuse Watford of being lazy, inconsistent with effort, or un-intense… But I will say that his intensity doesn’t show… It isn’t clearly defined to the fans in Assembly Hall. Watford’s face doesn’t change expression much, he does everything at about the same smooth speed, he doesn’t really make highlight-reel plays, and he never (unless he is beating UK with a buzzer-beater) does any theatrics to pump up the crowd – its just not Wat’s demeanor. I also wonder how much Cody’s sickness played into it… Crean may very well have been concerned about the energy level and effectiveness of Cody to start the game. I’m guessing that Crean wanted to make a point FROM THE TIP-OFF that IU is here to get in your face and kick your ass… And I think he thought starting Sheehey gave them the best opportunity to set that mood in the building.
2¢) there was probably a bit of a message to Wat. Independent of this decision, and before this game, one of the things that I had noticed from the first 2 games is that Watford was the only one on the team FORCING shots. Everyone else seemed to be getting theirs in transition or the flow of the offense. I thought it was most noticeable in the first couple minutes of those 2 games as well… Before IU had gotten in to a flow. Part of that was on Crean, because he was obviously calling plays to start each game that featured Watford in the post, but most of it was on Wat for making poor decisions when he received the ball down there or in other spots. Heading into the SHST game Watford was shooting only 33% FG and was 1-6 on 3′s, and it was because very few of them were rhythm shots. Meanwhile the rest of the team was shooting 55% from the floor (53-97 FG).
So my guess is that Crean wasn’t concerned so much about Watford’s effort and wanting to make a point… I think he wanted to FEATURE Sheehey’s antics knowing the energy it would create with the crowd from word GO, and knowing that if Watford came in with the team already in an offensive flow that he would get shots in rhythm instead of forcing them.
Posts like this is why Hillbilly is jealous and posts all his crap to get attention.
Geoff knows his basketball and Harvard can’t stand it.
Great job.
Good analysis, Geoff.
Geoff, I agree with Chet and Laffy on your analysis except for one point. You should have stated: “My 3 cents”. 1¢ + 2¢ = 3¢.
Geoff’s post was extremely insightful.
Jealous? Are you kidding me? I’m really not in that league. Won’t ever pretend, nor desire, to give you the type of detailed and in-depth look to the core that Geoff can provide.
I sorta cheat when I watch hoops. When I first saw Remy play, my analysis went something like this.
To Chet’s delight, a closer analysis of my predictions from last season serves as a long-awaited alternative to the repeated, ‘in your face,’ cut-and-paste.
Don’t get me wrong, I respectfully stop to take full notice when Geoff becomes territorial and takes us down the road his deep insights. I totally appreciate the enormity when he opens up on here and really lets it flow. I love it when he breaks it all into segments.
How long ago did you get banned from insidethehall Harvard?
My bad…It’s Friday.
It was a very good post, Geoff. I think there’s always a bit of preaching to the choir in these “messages.” And far wiser to set an example, be the stern Generalesque teacher sending the loafer to the corner of the classroom, against a Sam Houston State than a Kentucky team/game your season may hinge upon.
I thought Watford handled it all like the champion I’ve always believed him to be. Sheehey stepped up nicely..But, again, it was Sam Houston State.
Heard a song last night that I haven’t heard played on the radio for years…It was being played on n a very small market station…a real ’70s gem and an oldie that I had completely forgotten. It’s like discovering a dusty old heartwarming photo in the deep reserves the mind’s filing cabinet. Such a mystery is the brain.
Hope you don’t mind that I share.
Bring back the Twilight Zest!